Whalen's Evidence Reviewed
Whalen has mentioned "evidence" nearly 200 times in his posts thus far, including statements such as:Quote:"I have conviction, based on the evidence, that the King James Bible, is God's word preserved...
View ArticleRe: Whalen's Evidence Reviewed
He will not address this problem:p078.ezboard.com/fbibleversiondiscussionboardkjvonly.showMessage?topicID=2055.topicHe will not tell us which KJV is perfect.I would like to see his evidence so that I...
View ArticleRe: Whalen's Evidence Reviewed
Kinda reminds me of the old "Gong Show" where the man carrying a clarinet takes the stage and sings, "Gonna play my clarinet...gonna play my clarinet...gonna play my clarinet right now" over &...
View ArticleRe: Whalen's Evidence Reviewed
A typical KJVO tactic is to promise evidence, post a torrent of words that have nothing to do with any evidence for a coupla weeks, then, when reminded everyone's waiting for evidence, says, "I...
View ArticleRe: Whalen's Evidence Reviewed
I agree with Steel here. It has (1611 vs 1769 etc.) seemed to have quieted Mr. Kinney down at the Discussing Reformation Ez-board as he tries to spin every thread into KJO wars. No reasoning will...
View Article
